text-embedding-3-small performs well in semantic search pipelines when you need strong meaning-based retrieval with low latency and reasonable cost. In a typical “embed → index → retrieve → rerank (optional)” pipeline, it reliably places semantically related queries and passages close together, which improves recall over keyword-only search. For many developer-facing search experiences—docs search, support-ticket search, internal knowledge base search—it is accurate enough to be the default embedding model, especially when you care about throughput and predictable production behavior.
In concrete terms, you usually get good results if you structure the pipeline correctly. The biggest driver of quality is not “the model alone,” but (1) chunking strategy, (2) metadata filters, and (3) evaluation on real queries. For example, embedding whole documents often harms retrieval because embeddings become “averages” of multiple topics; instead, chunk docs into ~200–800 tokens (or roughly 1–5 paragraphs) with overlap, embed each chunk, and store chunk-level metadata (doc_id, section, updated_at). At query time, embed the user query with text-embedding-3-small, retrieve top-K similar chunks, and then stitch results back to documents. If you have structured constraints (product=“Cloud”, version=“2.6”), apply them as metadata filters before vector similarity ranking to avoid semantically close but irrelevant content.
Vector databases make this pipeline practical at scale. A vector database such as Milvus or Zilliz Cloud handles indexing and approximate nearest neighbor search efficiently, so you can query millions of chunks with low latency. In Milvus, you typically store a FLOAT_VECTOR field plus scalar fields for filters, create an ANN index, and use cosine similarity or inner product for retrieval. text-embedding-3-small’s efficiency is helpful here: smaller/efficient embeddings reduce ingestion cost and can improve query latency, which matters when semantic search is part of an interactive UI. The most reliable way to validate performance is to run an offline evaluation set (real queries + expected docs) and measure recall@K and MRR before and after you change chunking, K, or index params.
For more information, click here： https://zilliz.com/ai-models/text-embedding-3-small