🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz
  • Home
  • AI Reference
  • How do I integrate semantic search with traditional search engines like Elasticsearch?

How do I integrate semantic search with traditional search engines like Elasticsearch?

Integrating semantic search with traditional search engines like Elasticsearch involves combining keyword-based matching with context-aware semantic understanding to improve search relevance. Traditional search relies on exact keyword matches, TF-IDF, or BM25 scoring, which work well for straightforward queries but struggle with ambiguous terms or phrases requiring contextual interpretation. Semantic search, powered by modern NLP models, understands user intent and relationships between concepts. To integrate them, you can use a hybrid approach: use Elasticsearch for fast keyword-based retrieval and augment it with semantic ranking or filtering using vector embeddings.

First, you’ll need to generate vector embeddings for your documents. Tools like Sentence-BERT, OpenAI embeddings, or open-source models (e.g., all-MiniLM-L6-v2) can convert text into dense vectors that capture semantic meaning. Store these vectors in Elasticsearch using its dense_vector field type. For example, when indexing a product description like “wireless headphones with noise cancellation,” Elasticsearch would store both the text and its corresponding 384-dimensional vector. During a query, convert the user’s search phrase (e.g., “headphones that block background noise”) into a vector and use Elasticsearch’s knn (k-nearest neighbors) search to find documents with similar embeddings. This allows matching synonyms (“block” vs. “cancellation”) and broader concepts without exact keyword overlap.

Next, combine semantic results with traditional keyword scoring. One approach is to run both searches in parallel and merge the results. For instance, use Elasticsearch’s bool query for keyword matching and a script_score query to compute cosine similarity between the query vector and document vectors. Assign weights to each method (e.g., 60% semantic, 40% keyword) to balance precision and recall. Alternatively, use a two-stage process: retrieve a broad set of candidates via keywords, then rerank them semantically. For example, a search for “Java certification” might initially match documents containing “Java” and “certification,” but semantic reranking could prioritize resources about programming over those mentioning the island of Java. Tools like OpenSearch’s neural search plugin or custom Python scripts can streamline this workflow.

Consider practical challenges. Generating and storing vectors adds computational overhead, so optimize batch processing during indexing. Use approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) algorithms for faster vector searches—Elasticsearch’s knn option supports this natively. Monitor performance trade-offs: semantic search improves relevance but may increase latency. Test hybrid scoring weights with real user queries to find the right balance. For instance, an e-commerce site might prioritize semantic matches for vague queries like “comfortable summer shoes” but rely on keywords for specific SKU searches. By blending both techniques, you can leverage Elasticsearch’s scalability while adding semantic understanding to handle complex search scenarios.

Like the article? Spread the word