🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz
  • Home
  • AI Reference
  • What are the best practices for designing a document database schema?

What are the best practices for designing a document database schema?

Designing an effective document database schema requires focusing on how data is accessed, minimizing complexity, and optimizing for scalability. Unlike relational databases, document stores like MongoDB or Couchbase prioritize flexible, nested structures over rigid tables. The key is to model data around application workflows, embedding related information to reduce query overhead while avoiding overcomplication. Here are three core best practices.

First, structure documents based on access patterns. Analyze which data is frequently read or updated together and group it into a single document. For example, in an e-commerce app, a product document might include nested arrays for reviews, pricing history, or inventory details to avoid multiple queries. However, avoid embedding data that grows indefinitely (like log entries) to prevent oversized documents. Instead, reference separate collections when necessary. For instance, user orders could be split into a separate collection linked by a user ID if orders are queried independently.

Second, balance duplication and consistency. Document databases often denormalize data to improve read performance, but this requires careful handling of updates. For example, duplicating a user’s name in both a profile document and order documents avoids joins but necessitates updates across all duplicates if the name changes. Use database features like atomic transactions (if supported) or application-level logic to maintain consistency. Alternatively, accept eventual consistency for non-critical data, such as caching product ratings that refresh periodically rather than immediately.

Finally, plan for schema evolution. Even though document databases are schema-flexible, changes like adding fields or altering nested structures require forethought. Use versioning fields to manage gradual migrations, or design documents to tolerate missing fields with default application logic. For example, adding a “subscription_tier” field to user documents can be handled by treating missing values as “free tier” in code. Avoid breaking changes by testing schema updates in stages and documenting patterns for backward compatibility.

Like the article? Spread the word