🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz

What are the considerations for real-time multimodal search?

Real-time multimodal search involves querying across multiple data types (text, images, audio, video) and returning results with minimal latency. Developers must address three core challenges: efficient data processing and indexing, query handling across modalities, and balancing speed with accuracy. Each aspect requires careful design to handle diverse data formats while maintaining real-time performance.

First, data processing and indexing must account for the unique characteristics of each modality. For example, text data can be tokenized and embedded using models like BERT, while images may require convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or vision transformers to extract features. Audio and video need specialized preprocessing (e.g., spectrograms for sound, frame sampling for video). These embeddings must then be indexed in a way that supports fast retrieval. Vector databases like FAISS or Elasticsearch’s dense vector support are often used, but combining them for multimodal queries adds complexity. For instance, a social media app indexing user posts with images and captions must synchronize text and visual embeddings to enable searches like “find posts with dogs in parks” that cross-reference both modalities. Real-time indexing is also critical—new data (e.g., live video streams) must be processed and added to the index without delay.

Second, query execution must efficiently fuse inputs from multiple modalities and minimize latency. A user might search using a combination of text and an image (e.g., “find products similar to this photo under $50”). The system must process both inputs, convert them into embeddings, and search across fused or aligned indexes. Techniques like cross-modal retrieval models (e.g., CLIP for text-image alignment) can map different modalities into a shared embedding space. However, real-time constraints require optimizing these models for inference speed—using quantization, model pruning, or hardware acceleration (GPUs/TPUs). Approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) algorithms like HNSW or IVF reduce search time but may sacrifice precision. Developers must tune parameters like the number of probes in IVF or the graph depth in HNSW to balance speed and recall. For example, an e-commerce platform might prioritize speed for autocomplete suggestions but use stricter ANN settings for product image searches to ensure accuracy.

Finally, infrastructure scalability and result ranking are key. Real-time systems must handle concurrent queries across distributed data sources. Microservices architecture can isolate processing for each modality (e.g., a text service and an image service) while aggregating results via an API gateway. Latency spikes can occur if one modality’s service lags, so load balancing and caching partial results (e.g., precomputed image embeddings) are essential. Ranking multimodal results also poses challenges—combining relevance scores from text and image matches requires weighting strategies. A travel app searching for “beach resorts with sunset views” might prioritize image similarity over text if the user uploads a sunset photo, but adjust weights dynamically based on query context. Monitoring tools like Prometheus or distributed tracing (e.g., Jaeger) help identify bottlenecks, ensuring the system meets real-time SLAs even under heavy load.

Like the article? Spread the word