Using OpenClaw(Moltbot/Clawdbot) introduces real security risks because it is not just a passive chatbot; it is an automation system that can read data, call APIs, and perform actions on your behalf. The primary risk comes from over-privileged access. When you connect OpenClaw(Moltbot/Clawdbot) to email accounts, calendars, messaging apps, or cloud services, you are effectively granting an automated agent the ability to act as you. If API keys, OAuth tokens, or configuration files are leaked, an attacker could potentially use those credentials to read private data or trigger destructive actions.
Another risk lies in misconfigured automation and tool execution. OpenClaw(Moltbot/Clawdbot) can run shell commands, send messages, or modify external systems if those tools are enabled. Poorly scoped tools, overly permissive command execution, or missing confirmation steps can lead to unintended consequences. For example, a vague instruction combined with an overly powerful tool could delete files, send incorrect emails, or expose sensitive information. This risk is amplified when heartbeat automations run unattended on a schedule, because mistakes can repeat automatically.
Persistent memory also carries security implications. If you store long-term memory or documents without proper controls, sensitive data can accumulate silently over time. When developers integrate vector databases for memory—such as Milvus or managed Zilliz Cloud—they should enforce strict access control, encryption at rest, and clear data retention policies. The safest approach is to follow least-privilege principles everywhere: limit API scopes, restrict tools to narrow functions, review heartbeat behavior carefully, and treat OpenClaw(Moltbot/Clawdbot) as production automation software rather than a casual chat toy.